<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Clark Vs Vicky Tweed Amp Shoot Out</title>
        <link>http://bayareaguitarswap.com/topic/15/Clark-Vs-Vicky-Tweed-Amp-Shoot-Out</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ I have a Victoria 35310 Tweed amp, which is basically a replica of an old Fender Tweed Bandmaster. It sounds great and that&#39;s about all I use these days
with my Tele &amp; Strat. However, there has been an on-going net battle for years between Clark &amp; Victoria tweed users. I&#39;m just wondering if anyone
out there has had a chance to A/B the two brands side by side? If so, please share... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2011, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>ceco@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:06:32 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:34:32 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Clark Vs Vicky Tweed Amp Shoot Out ]]></title>
			<link>http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/1117/Clark-Vs-Vicky-Tweed-Amp-Shoot-Out#reply-1117</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I don&#39;t like the reissue P10R&#39;s, but the P10Q reissues are quiet good. If you got a chance, try them in your Victoria Bassman. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (00045)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/1117</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:34:32 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Clark Vs Vicky Tweed Amp Shoot Out ]]></title>
			<link>http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/1068/Clark-Vs-Vicky-Tweed-Amp-Shoot-Out#reply-1068</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I was lucky, the Vicky came with the new reissue Jensen P10&#39;s. I tore the amp apart soon after it arrived to see what made it tick. It&#39;s built very
nice and of course the circuit is extremely simply. I had a handful of NOS tubes, so I did a lot of experimenting myself. I&#39;m not sure exactly how I left
it, but it sounds very open and warm at all volume levels.
<br>
I hear that all speakers do have a break in period, so that could be a good part of the warmth associated with the real &#39;59&#39;s. Those are sweet... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Telemikester)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/1068</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:21:30 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Clark Vs Vicky Tweed Amp Shoot Out ]]></title>
			<link>http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/1067/Clark-Vs-Vicky-Tweed-Amp-Shoot-Out#reply-1067</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I played a few Victorias and liked them a lot. A friend of mine own&#39;s a 35115, which is a &#39;59 Pro copy. I own a real &#39;59 Pro and there was
something missing. The Victoria sounded somewhat stiff, we installed an old 50&#39;s Jensen P15N , NOS tubes. After that it sounded great, very close to my
Pro. I could be very happy with a Victoria, I would love to try one of their new Gibson replicas. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (00045)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/1067</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:23:48 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Clark Vs Vicky Tweed Amp Shoot Out ]]></title>
			<link>http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/914/Clark-Vs-Vicky-Tweed-Amp-Shoot-Out#reply-914</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hi 00045,
<br>
<br>
That&#39;s a good question. I can only think of one way to find out. Unfortunately I don&#39;t have a vintage Fender tweed to use to compare them. I did play
through an original &#39;59 Bassman prior to buying my Victoria 35310. This was many years ago, so I don&#39;t remembe the exact sound of the Fender. I do
rememeber that it was really beat up and expensive and I was concerned as to how much life was left in the old girl. Soon after I found Victorias&#39;s version
of the Bassman in a shop, played through that and decided to buy the lower wattage version that was closer to a Bandmaster.
<br>
It sounds absolutely perfect to my ears and for my guitars, so I no longer search for, or even pay much attention to amps.
<br>
Oh, I did play through Tricone&#39;s Clark. It sounded great! Very much like my Victoria, only smaller sounding with the lower wattage amp, one speaker, and
smaller pine cabinet. It still allowed a Tele to sound like a Tele... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Telemikester)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/914</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:27:55 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Clark Vs Vicky Tweed Amp Shoot Out ]]></title>
			<link>http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/905/Clark-Vs-Vicky-Tweed-Amp-Shoot-Out#reply-905</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ They are both good Fender clones. But the question should be &quot;How do they sound compared to an old Fender Tweed?&quot; ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (00045)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/905</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 01:52:32 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Clark Vs Vicky Tweed Amp Shoot Out ]]></title>
			<link>http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/638/Clark-Vs-Vicky-Tweed-Amp-Shoot-Out#reply-638</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ So Telemikester . . . what was your take on the Clark vs. Vicky pseudo-shootout, even though they were two different Fender clones? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Tricone)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/638</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 21:18:38 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Clark Vs Vicky Tweed Amp Shoot Out ]]></title>
			<link>http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/46/Clark-Vs-Vicky-Tweed-Amp-Shoot-Out#reply-46</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ BTW, Telemikester, you&#39;re welcome to stop by and put the Clark through its paces. Or I can bring it by and A/B it with your Vicky. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Tricone)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/46</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:49:10 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Clark Vs Vicky Tweed Amp Shoot Out ]]></title>
			<link>http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/17/Clark-Vs-Vicky-Tweed-Amp-Shoot-Out#reply-17</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I have a Clark Beaufort (Deluxe) and a Victoria 5112 (Champ). I suppose that I&#39;d be comparing the 5F1 circuitry to a that of a 5E3. That probably is not
apples to apples. The Clark is new, and I haven&#39;t had a chance to put it through its paces, let alone compare the two. However, I did play the Clark
briefly, and it does sound sweet. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Tricone)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bayareaguitarswap.com/reply/17</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:14:53 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Clark Vs Vicky Tweed Amp Shoot Out ]]></title>
			<link>http://bayareaguitarswap.com/topic/15/Clark-Vs-Vicky-Tweed-Amp-Shoot-Out</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I have a Victoria 35310 Tweed amp, which is basically a replica of an old Fender Tweed Bandmaster. It sounds great and that&#39;s about all I use these days
with my Tele &amp; Strat. However, there has been an on-going net battle for years between Clark &amp; Victoria tweed users. I&#39;m just wondering if anyone
out there has had a chance to A/B the two brands side by side? If so, please share... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Telemikester)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bayareaguitarswap.com/topic/15</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:06:32 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>
